oa.libraries, oa.budgets, oa.redirection,

peter.suber's bookmarks 2016-01-21

Summary:

"As you can see, these costs are not at all expensive in comparison to overall library materials budgets and the costs of many library subscriptions. I encourage you to speak with your campus librarians and press them to support these and similar open access initiatives. And to remember that all open access is connected: whether for sciences or humanities, journals or books, or archives. Because OA in any of these areas has the potential to free up money in support of OA in another. And the more examples we have of successful OA initiatives, the easier it will be to advance open access publishing models in the future.

But, of course, open access is not just, or even primarily, about saving money. Initially, it might even cost more or require hard decisions about what to support or no longer to support. Open access is primarily about enhancing access to scholarly content and enabling creative reuse. 

So, I advocate for taking some portion of library budgets that currently are used to purchase the products of legacy, closed-access publishers in order to facilitate open access to scholarship and unique primary source material through new publishing models...."

Link:

http://repository.brynmawr.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1080&context=greenfield_conference

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

Date tagged:

01/21/2016, 14:37

Date published:

01/21/2016, 09:37