NeuroChambers: Why I hate the ‘tone debate’ in psychology and you should too

peter.suber's bookmarks 2017-08-06

Summary:

"There’s this idea that open science will attract more 'disciples' if it comes across as having a more positive, inclusive tone. Goodness me, what a load of honking bullshit this is. Open science will attract individual adopters for three reasons: (1) when scientists grow a conscience and appreciate that their public mission demands transparency and reproducibility; (2) when scientists decide to take advantage of individual incentives (career and social) for being open (e.g. Registered Reports, joining SIPS etc.); (3) when funders, journals and institutions make it a requirement. All of these are in progress. The cold embrace of open science by gatekeepers and regulators is in the post – it is only a matter of time before transparent, reproducible practices will be required if you want to spend public money. That’s why I tell early career researchers to get ahead now because the ground is shifting under your feet...."

Link:

http://neurochambers.blogspot.com/2017/08/why-i-hate-tone-debate-in-psychology.html#1501973460584

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.debates oa.psychology oa.ecr oa.incentives oa.obstacles oa.open_science oa.ssh

Date tagged:

08/06/2017, 10:19

Date published:

08/06/2017, 06:19