Guest Post: An Open Letter from the Former HAU Staff 7 – Footnotes

peter.suber's bookmarks 2018-06-14


"We do not want people to think that HAU [Journal of Ethnographic Theory] failed because it was unviable as an Open Access model. HAU failed because of the misconduct of one key individual and because senior staff and colleagues did nothing to stop him, effectively enabling his misconduct and abuse....HAU is now a new kind of project. It is no longer OA and it belongs to the University of Chicago Press....

GDC [Giovanni Da Col] failed to consult the EAB [External Advisory Board] on key decisions affecting HAU and its future direction. Of most concern to us is his decision to ask authors, after their manuscripts have been accepted to HAU, to pay Article Processing Charges (APCs). This was a major policy change that deeply affected the principle of Open Access with which HAU began, and yet the EAB was in no way consulted. GDC took it upon himself to decide that HAU would no longer be Open Access and consulted no one before implementing this new policy direction...."




From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags: oa.anthropology oa.misconduct oa.conversions oa.people oa.fees oa.business_models oa.journals

Date tagged:

06/14/2018, 17:16

Date published:

06/14/2018, 13:20