Towards universal open access? Why we need bibliodiversity rather than a "silver bullet" | SciELO in Perspective

peter.suber's bookmarks 2018-08-15

Summary:

"As a conclusion, too often, the discussion on open access models is sometimes completely confused, sometimes too simplistic, and usually based on undue generalization of local situations and even singular experiences. It doesn’t reflect properly the variety of parameters that influence the way research is practiced and communicated amongst peers and towards societies at large. Therefore, we desperately need a better-informed discussion based on case studies and probably driven by the actor-network theory because it allows for a modelling of how diverse stakeholders interact in the scholarly communication process. Because we need not only open access, but above all open scholarly communication models that serve the actual needs of the research communities and societies to create knowledge and benefit from it, we need an open access model based on bibliodiversity."

Link:

https://blog.scielo.org/en/2018/08/14/towards-universal-open-access-why-we-need-bibliodiversity-rather-than-a-silver-bullet/#.W3RhJ5NKgwQ

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » lkfitz's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.scholcomm oa.societies oa.obstacles oa.green oa.gold oa.europe oa.libraries oa.fees oa.software oa.floss oa.business_models oa.offsets oa.strategies oa.platforms oa.infrastructure oa.repositories oa.journals oa.no-fee oa.bibliodiversity

Date tagged:

08/15/2018, 13:25

Date published:

08/15/2018, 10:15