For these academic journals, Wikipedia isn’t a bug—it’s a feature – Wikimedia Foundation

peter.suber's bookmarks 2018-09-25


"Wikimedia, especially Wikipedia, hasn’t always had the best of relationships with academia.

So you may be surprised to learn that there’s a trio of Wikimedia academic journals that are now accepting submissions: the WikiJournal of Medicine, Science, and Humanities. All are run on a traditional academic journal model, including an extensive peer review process by academic peers and the publication of a version of record that can be disseminated and cited.

The journal operates under a free copyright license, meaning here that others can take and use the text for any purpose, so long as they credit the original source and share it under a similar license. This allows volunteer Wikipedia editors to port the high-quality text into Wikipedia, bringing it to the encyclopedia’s millions of readers “for added reach and exposure,” as the journals’ about pages declare.

This process also works in reverse: some of the articles published by these journals are actually Wikipedia articles, usually submitted shortly after one or more editors have re-written them. These journals allow recognized experts in the field to vet the material.

We wanted to learn more about this innovative publishing model, so we asked several members of these journals’ editorial boards a few questions. Here’s what they had to say...."


From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags: oa.wikipedia oa.wikimedia oa.medicine oa.stem oa.humanities oa.ssh oa.journals

Date tagged:

09/25/2018, 09:33

Date published:

09/25/2018, 05:33