Why OBP is not participating in KU Open Funding: and why libraries should understand the reasons. | Open Book Publishers Blog

peter.suber's bookmarks 2018-10-30


"To begin with, we have had growing misgivings about the objectives and actions of KU since it transitioned from being a “non-profit” community interest company (registered in the UK) to a “for profit” commercial entity (registered in Germany), and in their own lack of openness about their business model and operations, echoing the concerns articulated by Marcel Knöchelmann his LSE Impact blog post.

More specific concerns with this particular programme emerged when OBP was invited to participate as a publisher and we were provided with a template publisher’s contract. The contract has a number of concerning restrictions, but the most concerning is the very first one:...

We also hope that funders will recognise the importance of developing open and collectively-controlled, community-driven infrastructures to sit alongside, and so place a competitive check on, profit-oriented alternatives. However, all of this requires action sooner rather than later; otherwise, there will be an established player and structure that is extremely difficult to displace."



From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks


oa.new oa.books oa.business_models oa.obp oa.profits oa.debates oa.infrastructure oa.objections oa.knowledge_unlatched oa.academic_led

Date tagged:

10/30/2018, 10:26

Date published:

10/30/2018, 10:02