Europe Speeds Ahead on Open Access: 2018 in Review | Electronic Frontier Foundation

peter.suber's bookmarks 2018-12-28


"Plan S reflects a more aggressive open access policy than FASTR does. FASTR requires that government agencies that fund scientific research require grantees to make their papers available to the public within a year of publication; the original publication can happen in a traditional, closed journal. (Most U.S. government agencies already have that requirement under a 2013 White House memo.)

Plan S takes that much further, requiring grantees to publish their research in an open access journal or repository from day one. What’s more, grantees must publish their papers under an open license allowing others to share and reuse them. In discussions on open access laws, EFF has long urged lawmakers to consider including open licensing mandates. Allowing the public to read the research is a great first step, but allowing the public to reuse and adapt it (even commercially) unlocks its true economic and educational potential. We hope to see more similarly strong open access reforms, both in the U.S. and around the world...."


From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags: oa.progress oa.growth oa.speed oa.europe oa.usa oa.fastr oa.plan_s oa.mandates oa.policies oa.legislation

Date tagged:

12/28/2018, 09:36

Date published:

12/28/2018, 04:37