Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints | bioRxiv

peter.suber's bookmarks 2019-01-13


Abstract:  Researchers in the life sciences are posting their work to preprint servers at an unprecedented and increasing rate, sharing papers online before (or instead of) publication in peer-reviewed journals. Though the popularity and practical benefits of preprints are driving policy changes at journals and funding organizations, there is little bibliometric data available to measure trends in their usage. Here, we collected and analyzed data on all 37,648 preprints that were uploaded to, the largest biology-focused preprint server, in its first five years. We find that preprints on bioRxiv are being read more than ever before (1.1 million downloads in October 2018 alone) and that the rate of preprints being posted has increased to a recent high of more than 2,100 per month. We also find that two-thirds of bioRxiv preprints posted in 2016 or earlier were later published in peer-reviewed journals, and that the majority of published preprints appeared in a journal less than six months after being posted. We evaluate which journals have published the most preprints, and find that preprints with more downloads are likely to be published in journals with a higher impact factor. Lastly, we developed, a website for downloading and interacting programmatically with indexed metadata on bioRxiv preprints.


From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » infodocketGARY's bookmarks

Tags: oa.preprints oa.bioarxiv oa.life_sciences oa.citations oa.versions oa.biology oa.medicine oa.growth oa.repositories.disciplinary oa.jif oa.trends oa.metadata oa.repositories oa.metrics oa.stem

Date tagged:

01/13/2019, 10:13

Date published:

01/13/2019, 08:45