My Draft Plan S Implementation Guidance Feedback | Martin Paul Eve | Professor of Literature, Technology and Publishing

peter.suber's bookmarks 2019-01-22


"I write to provide feedback in an individual capacity on the Plan S implementation guidelines.


I am extremely supportive of the cOAlition’s goals and Plan S in general. I disagree with those who say that the timeline is too short; many of these actors have not taken the opportunities over the last decade to experiment with open access or new business models and have only begun dialogue under the threat of immediate action. That said, I welcome the recent engagement by the Wellcome Trust and UKRI to speak with Learned Societies and to evaluate routes to their transition to Plan S compliance. Developing alternative revenue streams to support the activities of these bodies is not a small task, but it is crucial for the wellbeing of these disciplines, and for open access to prosper.

There are a few areas where the document could provide greater clarity...."


From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags: oa.plan_s oa.recommendations oa.societies oa.hybrid oa.fees oa.costs oa.prices oa.monopoly oa.xml oa.formats oa.humanities oa.terminology oa.business_models oa.repositories oa.ssh oa.journals

Date tagged:

01/22/2019, 13:38

Date published:

01/22/2019, 08:38