Additional points in my Plan S response | Martin Paul Eve | Professor of Literature, Technology and Publishing

peter.suber's bookmarks 2019-01-24


"Further to my other post earlier this week, I have added the additional points to my response letter to the Plan S implementation guidelines. These centre around monographs (9), REF involvement in Plan S (10), infrastructural support (11), the “time of publication” (12), clarification of the term “quality” (13), compliance of existing software with repository requirements (14), publisher deposition (15), and the ability to pursue defamation suits for wrongful attribution and reputational damage with the waiver of moral rights under CC BY 4.0 (16). If number 16 could be resolved, the open licensing landscape would be much clearer. The full letter is now available...."


From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags: oa.plan_s oa.books oa.infrastructure oa.assessment oa.quality oa.compliance oa.deposits oa.attribution oa.licensing oa.libre oa.repositories

Date tagged:

01/24/2019, 08:48

Date published:

01/24/2019, 03:48