OPERAS Declaration on the Plan S Implementation Guidance – OPERAS

peter.suber's bookmarks 2019-02-08

Summary:

"The level of technical compliance is not the same for journals and platforms on the one hand, and for repositories on the other hand. While, according to the guidance on the implementation of Plan S, journals and publishing platforms should provide “machine readable” formats (no requirement in terms of standards), repositories should store the full text in “XML in JATS standard (or equivalent)”. As any XML, HTML or even plain text can be considered a machine readable format, the requirement for repositories appears to be much higher. In particular so, considering that most of them do not meet the criteria currently. The same holds also true for many publishing platforms and journals. Therefore, the criteria for technical compliance for journals, platforms and repositories should be aligned....

More work should be done, nonetheless, on non-APC Open Access journals (known as “Diamond”), of which, according to DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals), more exist compared to Gold journals (9173 against 3299), particularly in the Social Sciences and Humanities. cOAlition S should allow for funding mechanisms to support Diamond journals which otherwise could be tempted to move towards Gold APC models to be eligible to receive cOAlition S grants...."

Link:

https://operas.hypotheses.org/2575

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » infodocketGARY's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.plan_s oa.guidelines oa.publishers oa.implementation oa.operas oa.books oa.gold oa.declarations oa.green oa.formats oa.licensing oa.no-fee oa.humanities oa.recommendations oa.repositories oa.libre oa.ssh oa.journals

Date tagged:

02/08/2019, 08:22

Date published:

02/08/2019, 03:57