The Scientific Paper Is Obsolete. Here's What's Next. - The Atlantic

peter.suber's bookmarks 2019-03-04


"Perhaps the paper itself is to blame. Scientific methods evolve now at the speed of software; the skill most in demand among physicists, biologists, chemists, geologists, even anthropologists and research psychologists, is facility with programming languages and “data science” packages. And yet the basic means of communicating scientific results hasn’t changed for 400 years. Papers may be posted online, but they’re still text and pictures on a page.

What would you get if you designed the scientific paper from scratch today? ...

Software is a dynamic medium; paper isn’t. When you think in those terms it does seem strange that research like Strogatz’s, the study of dynamical systems, is so often being shared on paper ...

I spoke to Theodore Gray, who has since left Wolfram Research to become a full-time writer. He said that his work on the notebook was in part motivated by the feeling, well formed already by the early 1990s, “that obviously all scientific communication, all technical papers that involve any sort of data or mathematics or modeling or graphs or plots or anything like that, obviously don’t belong on paper. That was just completely obvious in, let’s say, 1990,” he said. ..."





03/04/2019, 05:43

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks


oa.genres oa.journals oa.interactivity oa.incentives oa.recommendations oa.pdf oa.images oa.floss oa.jupyter oa.platforms oa.dynamic oa.open_notebooks oa.formats

Date tagged:

03/04/2019, 12:38

Date published:

04/05/2018, 06:43