Speeding up the publication process at PLOS ONE | EveryONE: The PLOS ONE blog

peter.suber's bookmarks 2019-05-17


"At PLOS ONE we like to speed up the publication process wherever we can. We like science to be out in the open, and publication of peer-reviewed research to take place without undue delays, so that others can use and build upon the findings. Aligned with our founding mission, we aim to be as fast as we can while remaining true to our publication criteria and without compromising the quality of the peer review process. To ensure common editorial standards across the journal we have also increased desk rejects of submission that fail our editorial criteria. This rate now stands at around 23%.


In the past few months we have seen a few exciting improvements in the speed of manuscript handling at PLOS ONE. During April our median time to first editorial decision after peer review dropped to 42 days. It was at 53 days a year ago. And our median time from submission to publication online has also dropped to 165 days in April, coming down from 183 days earlier in 2018. This means that manuscripts that we publish move now 18 days faster through the full peer review process than a year ago, and the first decision after peer review is reached 11 days earlier. A more comprehensive list of long-term metrics is appended below and on our web page. We are very grateful to the members of our Editorial Board and our reviewers that have facilitated a fast peer review at the journal...."



From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks


oa.new oa.gold oa.speed oa.plos oa.plos_one oa.publishers oa.publishing oa.journals

Date tagged:

05/17/2019, 09:31

Date published:

05/17/2019, 05:31