Open and Shut?: Why did Riksbankens Jubileumsfond decide to leave cOAlition S?

peter.suber's bookmarks 2019-06-07

Summary:

"Nevertheless, Plan S appears to still be struggling to sign up new funders. When it launched, there were 10 funders; today there are still only 19. Many believe this is too few to trigger the change to scholarly communication that cOAlition S members want. Importantly, the two largest producers of research papers in the world – China and the US – are notable by their absence from the coalition.

 

Perhaps unsurprisingly, while cOAlition S is quick to tell the world when it signs up a new funder, it is silent when a funder leaves the coalition. It has not, for instance, publicly commented on the decision by the Swedish Foundation for Humanities and Social Sciences (Riksbankens Jubileumsfond, or RJ) to leave the coalition. RJ’s name just disappeared from the Plan S web page sometime during the week beginning 20th May. How, when and why did RJ leave?..."

Link:

https://poynder.blogspot.com/2019/06/why-did-riksbankens-jubileumsfond.html

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.plan_s oa.sweden oa.funders oa.objections oa.humanities oa.ssh oa.speed

Date tagged:

06/07/2019, 09:10

Date published:

06/07/2019, 05:12