How a working group began the process of DORA implementation at Imperial College London – DORA

peter.suber's bookmarks 2019-10-11

Summary:

"Even so, it is much easier to sign DORA than to deliver on the commitment that signing entails. And while I would always recommend that universities sign as soon as they are ready to commit, because doing so sends such a positive message to their researchers, they should not put pen to paper without a clear idea of how signing will impact their approach to research assessment, or how they are going to develop any changes with their staff....

Out went phrases such as “contributions to research papers that appear in high-impact journals” to be replaced by “contributions to high quality and impactful research.” The change is subtle but significant – the revised guidance makes it plain that ‘impactful research’ in this context is not a cypher for the JIF; rather it is work “that makes a significant contribution to the field and/or has impact beyond the immediate field of research.” ..."

Link:

https://sfdora.org/2019/10/10/how-a-working-group-began-the-process-of-dora-implementation-at-imperial-college-london/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.dora oa.case oa.universities oa.p&t oa.ucl oa.assessment oa.jif oa.hei oa.metrics

Date tagged:

10/11/2019, 12:49

Date published:

10/11/2019, 08:49