What is a Sustainable Path to Open Access? | SIGPLAN Blog

peter.suber's bookmarks 2020-01-17


"The ACM OPEN plan, on the other hand, falls squarely in the second approach: mutualising costs. I think it is potentially viable, and virtuous. I say potentially because, as many pointed out (and as stated in the text of the ongoing petition), the calculations of the “cost” that is proposed to mutualise seem to include much more than the publication process alone. But also because we should think at a more global scale: this means in particular identifying the parts of the ACM publishing infrastructure that are specific, and mutualise with other entities those that are generic, bringing the overall cost down. More clarification is needed, but the recent second letter from ACM leadership lets us hope that ACM is able to listen to its members.

In any case, it’s important in this debate to have a clear sustainability plan, and analyze all the costs involved. On the one hand, one should not add to the bill costs unrelated to the publishing infrastructure. On the other hand, one must refrain from thinking that there is no cost apart from our own work as researchers/reviewers/editors/pc-chairs: even simply maintaining an online archive for the long term has a real, uncompressible cost, that we usually do not see until we have to actually run one [disclosure: I’m running one now]."



From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks


oa.new oa.sustainability oa.acm oa.societies oa.usa oa.trump oa.green oa.gold oa.business_models oa.repositories oa.journals oa.economics_of

Date tagged:

01/17/2020, 09:51

Date published:

01/17/2020, 04:51