Publishers withdraw more than 120 gibberish papers : Nature News & Comment

peter.suber's bookmarks 2014-02-25


"The publishers Springer and IEEE are removing more than 120 papers from their subscription services after a French researcher discovered that the works were computer-generated nonsense. Over the past two years, computer scientist Cyril Labbé of Joseph Fourier University in Grenoble, France, has catalogued computer-generated papers that made it into more than 30 published conference proceedings between 2008 and 2013. Sixteen appeared in publications by Springer, which is headquartered in Heidelberg, Germany, and more than 100 were published by the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE), based in New York. Both publishers, which were privately informed by Labbé, say that they are now removing the papers....Ruth Francis, UK head of communications at Springer, says that...the relevant conference proceedings were peer reviewed... — making it more mystifying that the papers were accepted. The IEEE would not say, however, ...whether submissions for the relevant conferences were supposed to be peer reviewed. “We continue to follow strict governance guidelines for evaluating IEEE conferences and publications,” Stickel said....Labbé emphasizes that the nonsense computer science papers all appeared in subscription offerings. In his view, there is little evidence that open-access publishers...necessarily have less stringent peer review than subscription publishers." 


From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks

Tags: oa.predatory oa.credibility oa.presentations oa.publishers oa.journals oa.quality oa.springer

Date tagged:

02/25/2014, 12:06

Date published:

02/25/2014, 07:06