Proxy Voting Fact Sheet

The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation 2012-06-14

Summary:

Editor’s Note: Matteo Tonello is managing director of corporate leadership at the Conference Board. This post is based on the May 2012 issue of the Conference Board’s Proxy Voting Fact Sheet series, authored by Mr. Tonello and Melissa Aguilar, researcher at the Conference Board. The original report is available here (registration required). This memo mentions the Shareholder Rights Project (SRP); posts about the SRP can be found here.

The declassification of the board of directors is emerging as one of the key highlights of the 2012 proxy season, as shareholder proposals on the subject continue to receive overwhelming support. This and other data from nearly 500 annual general meetings (AGMs) held at Russell 3000 companies in the January 1-April 30 period are discussed in the new edition of Proxy Voting Fact Sheet—the periodic report issued by The Conference Board in collaboration with FactSet Research.

In classified boards, members are divided into classes with directors in each class serving staggered terms (typically three years) so that only one class stands for election each year. Classification is used as a defensive measure to prevent hostile takeovers: when a board is staggered, hostile bidders must win more than one proxy contest at successive shareholder meetings to exercise control of the target. Proposals on declassification seek to discontinue this board structure in favor of a system of annual election for all members. The Fact Sheet reports that across the 17 proposals on declassification that went to a vote in the first four months of the year, the average support level was 75.9 percent of votes cast. The most notable examples included the 85.2 percent approval at Johnson Control, a 78.7 percent vote at F5 Networks, and the 77.2 percent vote at Emerson Electric.

Click here to read the complete post...

Link:

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2012/06/14/proxy-voting-fact-sheet/

From feeds:

Blogs.law Aggregation Hub » The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Tags:

practitioner publications academic research corporate elections & voting matteo tonello melissa aguilar shareholder proposals the conference board classified boards say on pay proxy voting board declassification

Authors:

Matteo Tonello, The Conference Board,

Date tagged:

06/14/2012, 13:30

Date published:

06/14/2012, 09:17