2013 Proxy Season Review

The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation 2013-08-05

Summary:

Editor's Note: James R. Copland is the director of the Manhattan Institute’s Center for Legal Policy. The following post is based on a memorandum from the Proxy Monitor project; the complete publication, including footnotes, is available here.

Corporate America’s "proxy season" has now wrapped up: most of America’s large publicly traded companies hold annual meetings to vote on business, including shareholder proposals, between April 15 and the end of June. Among the 250 largest U.S. public companies by revenues that constitute the Manhattan Institute’s Proxy Monitor database, 214 had held meetings by July 1.

In 2013, companies faced more shareholder proposals, on average, than in 2012, but the average support for proposals fell and a smaller percentage of proposals received the support of a majority of shareholders. The most commonly introduced type of proposal, as in 2012, involved companies’ political spending or lobbying; but as in 2012, none of these proposals passed, and shareholder support for this class of proposals held steady at a modest 18 percent.

This post discusses these results in more detail. First, the post summarizes 2013 shareholder proposals, including their rate of introduction and a breakdown of shareholder proposal types and shareholder proposal sponsorship. Next, the post examines voting results. Finally, the post looks in more depth at the most common class of proposal: that involving political spending or lobbying.

Click here to read the complete post...

Link:

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2013/08/05/2013-proxy-season-review-2/

From feeds:

Blogs.law Aggregation Hub » The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Tags:

practitioner publications boards of directors corporate elections & voting proxy season shareholder proposals executive compensation political spending sec institutional investors say on pay shareholder voting shareholder activism proxy voting james copland manhattan institute lobbying board declassification

Authors:

James R. Copland, Manhattan Institute,

Date tagged:

08/05/2013, 11:20

Date published:

08/05/2013, 09:07