Governance Practices for IPO Companies: A Davis Polk Survey

The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation 2014-02-03


Editor’s Note: Richard J. Sandler is a partner at Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and co-head of the firm’s global corporate governance group. This post is based on a Davis Polk client memorandum.

Amid the recent uptick in U.S. IPO transactions to levels not seen since the heady days of 1999 and 2000, Davis Polk’s pipeline of deals remains robust, leading us to believe that strength in the U.S. IPO market will continue in the near future. With ongoing pressure on companies that are past the IPO stage to update or modify their corporate governance practices to align with the views of some shareholders and proxy advisory groups, we thought this would be a good time to review corporate governance practices of newly public companies to see if they have also shifted in recent years. Our survey is an update of our October 2011 survey and focuses on corporate governance at the time of the IPO for the 100 largest U.S. IPOs from September 2011 through October 2013. Results are presented separately for controlled companies and non-controlled companies in recognition of their different governance profiles.

Click here to read the complete post...


From feeds: Aggregation Hub » The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation


boards of directors comparative corporate governance & regulation practitioner publications davis polk general governance ipos public firms richard sandler shareholder voting surveys


Richard J. Sandler, Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP,

Date tagged:

02/03/2014, 09:10

Date published:

02/03/2014, 09:10