Insider Trading and the Scienter Requirement

The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation 2012-09-24

Summary:

Editor’s Note: The following post comes to us from Donald Langevoort, Professor of Law at the Georgetown University Law Center.

On its face, the connection between insider trading regulation and the state of mind of the trader or tipper seems fairly intuitive. Insider trading is a form of market abuse: taking advantage of a material, non-public secret to which one is not entitled, generally in breach of some kind of fiduciary-like duty. It is an exploitation of status or access, typically coupled with some form of faithlessness. Certainly the extraordinary public attention that insider trading enforcement and prosecutions command reflects the idea that the essence of unlawful insider trading is cheating. These prosecutions are main-stage morality plays, with greed as the story line. The SEC in particular seems to sense that it garners public political support by casting itself in the role of tormentor of the greedy.

If this is right, then what the legal system should be looking to proscribe is deliberate exploitation—trading on the basis of information in order to gain an unfair, unlawful advantage over others in the marketplace. That involves a fairly tight causal connection between knowledge of the information and the decision to buy or sell.

Click here to read the complete post...

Link:

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2012/09/24/insider-trading-and-the-scienter-requirement/

From feeds:

Blogs.law Aggregation Hub » The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Tags:

academic research securities litigation & enforcement securities regulation insider trading donald langevoort information asymmetries securities fraud

Authors:

June Rhee, Co-editor, HLS Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation,

Date tagged:

09/24/2012, 10:50

Date published:

09/24/2012, 08:54