Harvard’s Shareholder Rights Project is Still Wrong

The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation 2012-11-30

Summary:

Editor’s Note: Martin Lipton is a founding partner of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, specializing in mergers and acquisitions and matters affecting corporate policy and strategy. Daniel A. Neff is co-chairman of the Executive Committee and partner at Wachtell Lipton. This post is based on a Wachtell Lipton memorandum by Mr. Lipton, Mr. Neff, Andrew R. Brownstein, Adam O. Emmerich, David A. Katz, and Trevor S. Norwitz. This post discusses the 2012/2013 activities of the Shareholder Rights Project, which are described in an earlier post here.

A small but influential alliance of activist investor groups, academics and trade unions continues — successfully it must be said — to seek to overhaul corporate governance in America to suit their particular agendas and predilections. We believe that this exercise in corporate deconstruction is detrimental to the economy and society at large. We continue to oppose it.

The Shareholder Rights Project, Harvard Law School’s misguided “clinical program” which we have previously criticized, today issued joint press releases with eight institutional investors, principally state and municipal pension funds, trumpeting their recent successes in eliminating staggered boards and advertising their “hit list” of 74 more companies to be targeted in the upcoming proxy season. Coupled with the new ISS standard for punishing directors who do not immediately accede to shareholder proposals garnering a majority of votes cast (even if they do not attract enough support to be passed) — which we also recently criticized — this is designed to accelerate the extinction of the staggered board.

Click here to read the complete post...

Link:

http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/corpgov/2012/11/30/harvards-shareholder-rights-project-is-still-wrong/

From feeds:

Blogs.law Aggregation Hub » The Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Financial Regulation

Tags:

practitioner publications wachtell lipton corporate elections & voting shareholder proposals martin lipton shareholder rights project staggered boards program research daniel neff david katz shareholder activism andrew brownstein trevor norwitz adam emmerich

Authors:

Martin Lipton and Daniel Neff, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz,

Date tagged:

11/30/2012, 15:26

Date published:

11/30/2012, 08:55