Opposition to Research Works Act

Connotea Imports 2012-07-31

Summary:

"As both a publisher and a membership organization, the MLA [Modern Language Association] understands that a publisher’s ability to earn revenue from the services that it provides need not be hindered by the provision of broad public access to scholarly work. Preprint archives, for example, need not compete with formal publications. New business models for the sustainability of open access publications are developing. Unnecessary limits on the free flow of ideas compromise a robust exchange of information and knowledge. In reviewing the language of the Research Works Act and considering the implications of its provisions, the MLA concludes that this legislation has significant negative ramifications for the future of public access to scholarly material and research. The association therefore opposes passage of this legislation...."

Link:

http://www.mla.org/ec_opp_rwa

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Connotea Imports

Tags:

ru.no oa.new oa.comment oa.usa oa.legislation oa.negative oa.rwa oa.nih oa.copyright oa.societies oa.humanities oa.mla oa.ssh

Authors:

petersuber

Date tagged:

07/31/2012, 11:48

Date published:

01/26/2012, 10:21