PLoS Biology: Why Full Open Access Matters

Connotea Imports 2012-07-31


"Scientific authors who pay to publish their articles in an open-access publication should be congratulated for doing so. They also should be aware that they may not be getting full open access from some publications that charge for publication under the “open access” label. Two features define an open-access publication: (1) the published contents are freely accessible through the Internet, and (2) readers are given copyright permission (see Box 1) to republish or reuse the content as they like so long as the author and publisher receive proper attribution. Recently, some publications have begun offering an open-access option that charges for Internet publication without granting readers full reuse rights, such as Springer's Open Choice or Nature's Scientific Reports. These publishers have adopted a business model through which authors pay for immediate publication on the Internet but the publisher nonetheless keeps commercial reuse rights for itself. This is not full open access...."


From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Connotea Imports

Tags: oa.copyright oa.libre oa.terminology oa.definitions



Date tagged:

07/31/2012, 12:10

Date published:

11/30/2011, 14:51