Will Reference Books and Journals Survive? A Debate

Connotea Imports 2012-07-31

Summary:

"This year’s plenary Oxford-style debate at the Profession and Scholarly Publishing (PSP) Annual Conference had as its proposition, “The journal and the contributing reference book are no longer valuable as the unit of professional content distribution, and will die.” Brian O’Leary of Magellan Media Partners and I [Kent Anderson] debated Brian Crawford of the American Chemical Society and Michael Fisher of the Harvard University Press in front of a large crowd in Washington, DC, yesterday....Crawford and Fisher defended the role of expertise, stressed the relative immutability of the functions of the reference book and journal in both academic life and intellectual output, spoke to the power of the tenure and promotion system in a publish-or-perish culture, and underscored the importance of trusted brands in an information realm that is exploding with choice. O’Leary and I observed that while research reporting and reference works are still important, their containers are changing, evolving from time-limited and space-limited entities into updated, boundless, and interactive forms we’re still exploring. These changes will change editorial and authorship functions, and are already changing how readers access and evaluate content...."

Link:

http://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2011/02/03/will-reference-books-and-journals-survive-a-debate/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Connotea Imports

Tags:

ru.no oa.journals oa.new oa.books oa.events oa.debates

Authors:

petersuber

Date tagged:

07/31/2012, 14:40

Date published:

02/06/2011, 13:05