[GOAL] Publishers Association Proposal to HEFCE
pontika.nancy@gmail.com's bookmarks 2014-10-13
Summary:
[Forwarded from GOAL] "I just noticed the September 12 proposal to HEFCE by the Publishers
Association
.
The proposal -- which is as predictable as the succession of night upon day
-- is the following:
*1. Don't require deposit upon the date of acceptance, because publisher
embargoes are timed to begin on the date of publication, not the date of
acceptance.*
*2. Don't require deposit of the author's final draft; wait for the
publisher's version of record.*
*3. Don't require deposit at all: let us take care of it
,
after our embargo has elapsed: then you don't have to worry about figuring
out the date of publication.*
*4. Please send us a justification for wanting to do otherwise.*
Now I find these four points so outrageous and presumptuous -- and so
transparently self-interested, running roughshod over the interests of
research, researchers, their institutions, their funders, and the
tax-paying public -- that they don't need to be answered at all (and of
course they need not and should not be heeded in any way) ..."
Link:
http://mailman.ecs.soton.ac.uk/pipermail/goal/2014-October/002974.htmlFrom feeds:
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » pontika.nancy@gmail.com's bookmarksOpen Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com