Recommendations on RCUK OA Draft Policy

Amsciforum 2013-03-10

Summary:

A license that formally allows more re-use rights (e.g., "Libre OA", CC-BY) is desirable, but it asks for more than just free online access ("Gratis OA") at a time when we are stiill far from having free online access. It thereby puts more constraints on authors, demands more of publishers, and makes it harder for that vast majority of institutions and funders who have not yet managed to reach consensus on adopting a Green OA self-archiving mandate to reach consensus, because of the added constraints. RCUK should strongly encourage "Lbre OA", but only "Gratis OA" (which automatically includes linking, downloading, local print-off, local storage, local data-mining, search-engine harvesting and search) should be required. The designated locus of deposit should be the fundee's own institutional repository, not an institution-external central repository. Central repositories and search engines can then harvest the metadata from the institutional repository for search for re-display. The optimal Green OA Mandate is ID/OA -- Immediate Deposit, Optional Access -- is identical to the RCUK Mandate in every respect except that it stipulates that the deposit itself must be done immediately upon acceptance for publication, rather than only after the allowable embargo period has expired. This means that users will see the metadata immediately, and can already make automated eprint requests to the author for single copies for research purposes during the embargo. Repository deposit should be officially stipulated as the sole mechanism for submitting publications for research assessment as well as for submitting publication lists for RCUK research proposals.

Link:

http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/876-.html

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) ยป Amsciforum

Tags:

oa.new oa.mandates rae oa.frpaa oa.rcuk oa.policies

Authors:

stevanharnad

Date tagged:

03/10/2013, 12:30

Date published:

03/14/2012, 15:00