Cornell, Arxiv and Institutional vs. Central Repositories

Amsciforum 2013-03-10

Summary:

No one wants Arxiv to disappear, but I'll bet that within a decade Arxiv will just be an automated harvester of deposits from authors' own institutional repositories, not a locus of direct, institution-external deposit. In the age of Institutional Repositories, it is no longer necessary -- nor does it make sense -- for authors to self-archive institution-externally. It is also a needless central expense to manage deposit centrally. It makes much more sense to deposit institutionally and harvest centrally.

Link:

http://openaccess.eprints.org/index.php?/archives/769-guid.html

Updated:

10/18/2010, 05:30

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) ยป Amsciforum

Tags:

oa.new oa.mandates oa.green oa.scoap3 harvesting locus of deposit cornell oa.ir oa.policies oa.repositories.disciplinary oa.arxiv oa.metadata oa.repositories

Authors:

stevanharnad

Date tagged:

03/10/2013, 12:44

Date published:

10/08/2010, 21:42