Subject objects

Zotero / D&S Group / Top-Level Items 2020-01-08

Type Journal Article Editor Celia Roberts Editor Myra J. Hird Author Lucy Suchman URL http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1464700111404205 Volume 12 Issue 2 Pages 119-145 Publication Feminist Theory ISSN 1464-7001, 1741-2773 Date 08/2011 Journal Abbr Feminist Theory DOI 10.1177/1464700111404205 Accessed 2020-01-08 18:19:50 Library Catalog DOI.org (Crossref) Language en Abstract The focus of my inquiry in this article is the figure of the Human that is enacted in the design of the humanoid robot. The humanoid or anthropomorphic robot is a model (in)organism, engineered in the roboticist’s laboratory in ways that both align with and diverge from the model organisms of biology. Like other model organisms, the laboratory robot’s life is inextricably infused with its inherited materialities and with the ongoing – or truncated – labours of its affiliated humans. But while animal models are rendered progressively more standardised and replicable as tools for the biological sciences, the humanoid robot is individuated and naturalised. Three stagings of human–robot encounters (with the robots Mertz, Kismet and Robota respectively) demonstrate different possibilities for conceptualising these subject objects, for the claims about humanness that they corporealise, and for the kinds of witnessing that they presuppose.