Defining Open Peer Review: Part One – Competing Definitions : OpenAIRE blog

lkfitz's bookmarks 2016-11-21

Summary:

"ABSTRACT: At present there is neither a standardized definition of “open peer review” (OPR) nor an agreed schema of its features and implementations, which is highly problematic for discussion of its potential benefits and drawbacks. This new series of blog posts reports on work to resolve these difficulties by analysing the literature for available definitions of “open peer review” and “open review”. In all, 122 definitions have been collected and codified against a range of independent OPR traits, in order to build a coherent typology of the many different adaptations to the traditional peer review that have come to be signified by the term OPR and hence provide a unified definition."

Link:

https://blogs.openaire.eu/?p=1371

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » lkfitz's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.peer_review oa.standards oa.obstacles oa.definitions oa.open_science oa.openaire oa.preprints oa.green oa.repositories oa.versions

Date tagged:

11/21/2016, 15:09

Date published:

11/21/2016, 10:09