NeuroChambers: Why I hate the ‘tone debate’ in psychology and you should too

lkfitz's bookmarks 2017-08-08

Summary:

"There is an extremely boring, seemingly indestructible, debate going on in psychology about the ‘tone’ of scientific debate in our field. The root of this peculiar argument is that the nature of some discussion surrounding open science and reform is apparently too negative, too critical, and too personal, and that this pushes people away from doing better science."

Link:

http://neurochambers.blogspot.com/2017/08/why-i-hate-tone-debate-in-psychology.html

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » lkfitz's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.psychology oa.open_science oa.comment oa.reproducibility oa.incentives oa.mandates oa.policies oa.ssh

Date tagged:

08/08/2017, 09:36

Date published:

08/08/2017, 05:36