The Costs of Knowledge: scientists want their cut on the scam – For Better Science

lkfitz's bookmarks 2017-08-25


"But some academics seem to have a different viewpoint on how to respond to publishers ripping off their own research institutions. They want their cut on the scam, namely to be paid for their peer review services. The idea is: since peer reviewing duties are not directly specified as such in faculty employment contracts, they must be then not a part of research activities, but a kind of voluntary charity to your peers, or in fact to commercial publishers. As journals and their for-profit owners (because even academic society-run journals are for-profit) make such big money publishing peer reviewed research, the peer reviewers want their share. And they don’t seem to spare a thought if science gets damaged beyond repair in the process."


From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » lkfitz's bookmarks

Tags: oa.comment oa.elsevier oa.boycotts oa.publishers oa.advocacy oa.libraries oa.budgets oa.cancellations oa.negotiations oa.fees oa.peer_review oa.societies oa.journals

Date tagged:

08/25/2017, 11:42

Date published:

08/25/2017, 07:42