The enemy of the good: How specifics in publisher’s green OA policies are bogging down IR deposits of scholarly literature | Sterman | College & Research Libraries News

lkfitz's bookmarks 2017-09-14

Summary:

"Publishers increasingly allow green open access, but without any consistency in policies or embargoes. This creates an unnecessary amount of work for institutions and authors to comply with the often-changing policies across disciplines and publishers. In many author agreements, authors assign copyright to the publisher and the publisher allows the right to post preprint (pre-peer review version) or postprint (after peer review version) copies on the web. Whatever justification publishers give for their arbitrary restrictions on green open access activities, they undermine their own justification with the diversity of policies, restrictions, embargoes, and versions they impose on depositing copies of published journal articles."

Link:

http://crln.acrl.org/index.php/crlnews/article/view/16699/18181

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » lkfitz's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.green oa.deposits oa.policies oa.publishers oa.postprints oa.libraries oa.preprints oa.obstacles oa.compliance oa.embargoes oa.copyright oa.recommendations oa.versions oa.repositories

Date tagged:

09/14/2017, 15:49

Date published:

09/14/2017, 11:49