Why I don’t share Elsevier’s vision of the transition to open access | Reciprocal Space

lkfitz's bookmarks 2017-10-03

Summary:

"Last week Elsevier’s VP for Policy and Communications, Gemma Hersh, published a think-piece on the company’s vision of the transition to open access (OA). She makes some valid points but glosses over others that I would like to pick up on. Some of Elsevier’s vision is self-serving, but that should come as no surprise since the company has skin in the game and naturally wants to defend its considerable commercial interests.  And some of it is, frankly, bizarre. You can read the whole article for yourself – it’s not long. I would recommend also having a look at the reaction from the OECD’s Toby Green. Below, I have highlighted and commented  on (in blue) the portions that struck me, and tried to fill in some of the missing pieces of what is a very tricky puzzle."

Link:

http://occamstypewriter.org/scurry/2017/10/03/why-i-dont-share-elseviers-vision-of-the-transition-to-open-access/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » lkfitz's bookmarks
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Amyluv's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.elsevier oa.max_planck oa.gold oa.publishers oa.publishing oa.business_models oa.obstacles oa.green oa.economics_of oa.scoap3 oa.strategies oa.predatory oa.europe oa.costs oa.hybrid oa.funding oa.repositories oa.journals

Date tagged:

10/03/2017, 12:16

Date published:

10/03/2017, 05:10