How’s EPA’s Science Advice Process Doing? Celebrating Sunshine and Progress at the EPA - Union of Concerned Scientists

lterrat's bookmarks 2017-03-16


"Along with new attacks on transparency, some of the old ones are rearing their ugly heads, including the HONEST Act and the EPA Science Advisory Board (SAB) Reform Act. These pieces of legislation are Trojan-horse transparency measures that would actually hurt the ability of agencies to protect public health by wasting agency resources and allowing industry to have more influence on agency science advice. They are attempts to fix problems that do not exist.

This week, the EPA’s Office of the Inspector General (IG) released a report looking at how the EPA engages with and manages the recommendations from its eight science and research advisory committees. What do its results tell us? The EPA is already doing a very good job at ensuring that the operations of its federal advisory committees (FACs) and the agency’s responses to science advice are transparent. There is of course always room for improvement when it comes to public access to information, but the EPA is efficiently managing and communicating its interactions with its FACs. Its updates to comply with the most recent Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) amendments are still pending, but that’s a sunshine issue for another day."


From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » lterrat's bookmarks

Tags: oa.usa oa.trump oa.negative oa.obstacles oa.epa oa.government oa.open_science oa.progress oa.policies oa.implementation oa.compliance

Date tagged:

03/16/2017, 21:39

Date published:

03/16/2017, 17:39