Αξιολόγηση του εργαστηρίου «Δημιουργία και Επικαιροποίηση Συνδέσμων μεταξύ των Καθιερωμένων Όρων της ΕΒΕ με το Wikidata» | Ίδρυμα Ανοικτής Γνώσης Ελλάδας OK Greece

From Google Translate: "Positively evaluated the participants the workshop 'Creating and Updating Links between the standard terms of the CCI Wikidata', which was held in the framework of the conference 'Opening our Data toDay: Open Governance, Transparency, Inclusivity' as Messrs Sotirios Karampataki Charalambos armrests, the Open Knowledge Greece.

Recalling that under the laboratory more than 30 participants, librarians scientists in the majority and scientists from other disciplines were informed about recent developments in the Semantic Web and in particular on the role of libraries as a focal point in the development of Web Data through the presentation of Wikidata service and how it uses Libraries data for verification of standard conditions (authority control). It also became the first presentation of the status NLG ID of Wikidata, ie the identifier of rubric CCI, an action of the Open Institute of Knowledge, based on the list of standard conditions of the National Library of Greece, how can this be used and the benefits that may arise.

Regarding the assessment, participants were asked to answer a questionnaire, which consisted of two parts: a) evaluation of the laboratory and b) an assessment of a range of application from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).

About the workshop, the majority of participants found it very interesting (40%) to interest (40%). Strong interest in further information about the Semantic Web and how can it help in work and life of the participants expressed the 40%, 40% interest and enough interest to 20%. Finally, most respondents (60%) expressed a strong interest in future participation in similar actions. It is worth mentioning that in the general comments on the workshop, highlighted the interest on the part of learners and zeal on the part of trainers.

[...]

On the application in question if they would like the participants to use the application more often, the interest moved from moderate to severe. On whether the application seemed unnecessarily complicated, the majority of participants (60%) expressed a negative opinion, in contrast with the ease of use, which positively responded to 80% of the participants. Indeed, the majority of participants (60%) would not need support from a technician, in order to use it. The various functions of the application considered well integrated (60%), while the majority of participants are not identified inconsistencies. Also, the majority believes that most users could learn the application quickly (40%) to very fast (40%) and most (60%) did not find it complicated to use. They felt sure who used the application, while most do not consider that they need more knowledge before they start using it. In general comments highlighted the usefulness of the application and possibilities of further improvement."