Potential Predatory vs. Legitimate Journals: Can You Tell the Difference? | Himmelfarb News

lterrat's bookmarks 2017-07-13

Summary:

"A recent article published in the March 2017 issue of BMC Medicine provides the results of just such a comparison. A cross-sectional comparison of potentially predatory, presumed legitimate open access, and presumed legitimate subscription-based biomedical journals was conducted. Roughly 100 randomly selected journals in each category was selected for this review. Each journal was evaluated on criteria within specific characteristics including:

  • Aims & scope
  • Journal name & publisher
  • Homepage integrity (look & feel)
  • Indexing & impact factor
  • Editors & staff
  • Editorial process & peer review
  • Publication ethics & policies
  • Publication model & copyright
  • Journal location & contact

The results are summarized in this infographic:

https://magic.piktochart.com/embed/22961232-predatory-vs-legitimate-can-you-tell-the-difference"

Link:

https://himmelfarblibrary.wordpress.com/2017/07/12/potential-predatory-vs-legitimate-journals-can-you-tell-the-difference/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » lterrat's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.journals oa.infographics

Date tagged:

07/13/2017, 22:43

Date published:

07/13/2017, 18:43