Publikationsfreiheit.de, Open Access und Geisteswissenschaften. | LIBREAS.Library Ideas

lterrat's bookmarks 2017-08-01

Summary:

"The history of the publishing industry shows that small and medium-sized independent publishers, like other companies, have always been subject to becoming and passing away. It also shows that the calculation on edge in such houses was more of a rule than an exception. There are few indications for causalities between open access and a failure in a market that is changing in many ways. The anti-open-access narrative, therefore, has long been used by the practice of the very open prognosis. Surprisingly, however, unlike other areas of the media and creative industries (keyword journalism), the field of the humanities' intellectual publishing industry is not particularly affected by the disruptions of digitalization.

The fact that Open Access offers opportunities for German science publishers does not seem to be excluded in anybody. However, working examples are missing. The dialogue in this respect can nevertheless be sought regularly. This seems all the more constructive, as it is constantly moving along the hyperbola of the threatened freedom rights. This overpowering of the discourse offers not only no way out - as one must see the current texts Uwe Jochums, who now also has to try secret interests of a George Soros to somehow keep his argument tight (which nowhere succeeds). Rather, in the end it is even taken as a subordinate and declining account so seriously that collateral damage is the result of an impractical law of science, which, for example, That future generations can know what was discussed in the faz.net of the present. No one, who is concerned with the spiritual and cultural sciences of the future, can seriously want that."

Link:

https://libreas.wordpress.com/2017/07/31/open-access_publikationsfreiheit/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » lterrat's bookmarks

Tags:

Date tagged:

08/01/2017, 23:20

Date published:

08/01/2017, 19:20