Open Access Publishing: Fact or Fiction? | What's New @ HHSL

Amyluv's bookmarks 2017-10-27

Summary:

"Open Access publications have been around for decades yet there are still many misconceptions and doubts about their reliability, quality and value. One of the top misconceptions is that Open Access journals are of lower quality, not peer-reviewed, and the equivalent of self-publication. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, a highly respected publication founded in 1924 and published by the American Society for Clinical Investigation, is a peer-reviewed biomedical research journal covering a range of medical disciplines incuding Immunology, Neuroscience, Oncology, and Gastroenterology. In 1996 it was one of the first to make its research articles freely available. Why would they do such a thing? According to the editor at the time, the non-profit nature of their work informed their decision. Today, according to SCOPUS, the journal has a CiteScore* of 10.98, a SCImago Journal Rank (SJR)** of 8.074, and a Source Normalized Impact Per Paper (SNIP)Ɨ of 2.787."

Link:

https://sites.tufts.edu/hhslnews/2017/10/25/open-access-publishing-fact-or-fiction/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Amyluv's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.journals oa.publishing oa.peer_review oa.benefits oa.plos oa.misunderstandings oa.citations

Date tagged:

10/27/2017, 01:01

Date published:

10/26/2017, 21:01