There’s No Such Thing As ‘Sound Science’ | FiveThirtyEight

Amyluv's bookmarks 2017-12-07

Summary:

"Science is being turned against itself. For decades, its twin ideals of transparency and rigor have been weaponized by those who disagree with results produced by the scientific method. Under the Trump administration, that fight has ramped up again. In a move ostensibly meant to reduce conflicts of interest, Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt has removed a number of scientists from advisory panels and replaced some of them with representatives from industries that the agency regulates. Like many in the Trump administration, Pruitt has also cast doubt on the reliability of climate science. For instance, in an interview with CNBC, Pruitt said that “measuring with precision human activity on the climate is something very challenging to do.” Similarly, Trump’s pick to head NASA, an agency that oversees a large portion the nation’s climate research, has insisted that research into human influence on climate lacks certainty, and he falsely claimed that “global temperatures stopped rising 10 years ago.” Kathleen Hartnett White, Trump’s nominee to head the White House Council on Environmental Quality, said in a Senate hearing last month that she thinks we “need to have more precise explanations of the human role and the natural role” in climate change."

Link:

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-easiest-way-to-dismiss-good-science-demand-sound-science/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » peter.suber's bookmarks
Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » Amyluv's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.open_science oa.transparency oa.trump oa.scholcomm oa.reproducibility oa.government oa.policies oa.epa oa.usa oa.legislation oa.climate oa.environment

Date tagged:

12/07/2017, 12:21

Date published:

12/07/2017, 07:10