Åpen Vitenskap: Vesten har _kanskje_ _ett_ kort igjen, og det er åpen vitenskap i åpne samfunn.

Google English: "The West has a chance, and it is open science in open society.

The Center for Open Science has made a nice list of tips for promoting open science, "Open Science at Universities", which in my opinion is nothing to trick at once, and for those who wonder, the COS serves a complete organized thematic literature review as background material which is behind, and even a complete Zotero library that you can synchronize with . The list is very short and I have commented on braces: 'Policies: Template of TOP Guidelines for research institutes . (So uncontroversial that several of the major magazine publishers have adopted TOP Guidelines)'...

Thus, all of these do not affect any open controversial questions, even the magazine publishers agree with this. However, it is typical of the EU to reap the low-key fruits, then leaving the important controversial details of how and what to secret conversations, where powerful alliances between business and technocrats release the troublesome democracy. For example, to live the "Freedom of Information" act, which sounds nice in the party talks, is something that has to be halved and withdrawn from the EU bureaucracy. And ScienceEurope, an organization for research financiers in the EU, runs the same line of creating letters and lists of everything that is uncontroversial but shadows the path as soon as the conflict between business and the rest of society does not match, as Peter Suber noted on Twitter: 'Peter Suber @petersuber March 24th. More Unfortunately, nothing in this @ScienceEurope open letter on research infrastructure calls for * open * infrastructure, that is, #opensource and #nonprofit infrastructure. Without that, open research is at risk of corporate capture (like @ssrn & @bepress). http://www.scienceeurope.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/SE_Open_Letter_RIs.pdf'" ...