Workshop Monitoring Open Access โ€” Nederlands | 23-05-2018, Den Haag

ab1630's bookmarks 2018-05-05

Summary:

Google English: "Workshop Monitoring Open Access

How open is Dutch science? How far are we in the ambition to have 100% Open Access publications realized in 2020? And how do Dutch universities differ in Open Access? To answer these burning questions, monitoring Open Access is crucial.

Open Access can however be mapped in different ways; results depend on definitions, the available data and the accuracy of the data.

There are many open questions and therefore DANS organizes a workshop on the monitoring of Open Access on 23 May. Different speakers present their methods and there is plenty of room for discussion and exchange.

The working language of the workshop has changed to English. Please note: The language of the workshop has been changed to English.

Participation in the workshop is free, but you must register in advance via the registration form.

Chairman of the day: Peter Doorn, director of DANS.

Speakers

Jeroen Bosman and Bianca Kramer (Utrecht University): Open access monitoring: transparency and independency

Levels of OA can be measured on the basis of open available external data, (such as Unpaywall data). The overview of publications themselves can come from institutions themselves or from eg Web of Science, Scopus or Dimensions. In this way, different types of OA (green, gold, hybrid, bronze) can be determined in an unambiguous and institution-independent way. Jeroen Bosman and Bianca Kramer talk about the advantages and disadvantages of this approach.

Thed van Leeuwen (CWTS): Interplay or bibliometrics, scientific community, and science policy in the monitoring of OA publishing

To measure OA, CWTS has developed a methodology that Thed van Leeuwen will present. He would also like to discuss open questions about OA, such as opening up various OA versions, and striving for uniformity in definitions and procedures.

Just de Leeuwe (Delft University of Technology): Open Access monitoring or peer-reviewed articles in the Netherlands

For the measurement of OA publications within Dutch universities, the classification of gold / hybrid / green has been chosen. While there is consensus on what we understand under OA, there is less uniformity about how we can measure open access articles. Just de Leeuwe talks about the process and methodology of OA measurements and important outstanding questions.

Emil Bode (DANS): Open Access monitoring using NARCIS

Emil Bode has compared available data from the national portal NARCIS with open available data from Unpaywall. He explains more about his findings and possibilities to help improve these systems by comparing data from different systems, and thus increase the reliability of OA monitoring."

Link:

https://dans.knaw.nl/nl/actueel/workshop-monitoring-open-access

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) ยป ab1630's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.dutch oa.metrics oa.assessment oa.definitions oa.gold oa.hybrid oa.netherlands oa.journals oa.events

Date tagged:

05/05/2018, 15:43

Date published:

05/05/2018, 11:43