An examination of the effect of open versus paywalled access publication on the disseminative impact and citation count of publications in intensive care medicine and anesthesia - Journal of Critical Care

ab1630's bookmarks 2018-06-03

Summary:

"Abstract

Purpose We aimed to assess the impact of open access (OA) versus paywalled access (PA) publication on Altmetric Attention Scores (AAS) and whether AAS correlates with future citation count access in the context of intensive care medicine (ICM) and anesthesia.

Methods 1854 and 2935 publications, in the year 2015, were identified in ICM and anesthesia respectively, using a Pubmed search. The mean AAS was measured for each article.

Results More ICM articles were OA, compared to of anesthesia articles (38.9% v 35.0% p = 0.02). The mean AAS for OA ICM publications was significantly higher than that of PA ICM publications (17.34 vs 8.45, p < 0.01), however, this was not observed when examined in a fixed follow up time frame. AAS appear to correlate with future citation counts.

Conclusions ICM publications that are available as OA in the medium term result in higher AAS when compared to PA publications, this phenomenon was not observed in anesthesia. AAS correlate with future citation counts, however, a larger study is required to confirm this...."

An examination of the effect of open versus paywalled access publication on the disseminative impact and citation count of publications in intensive care medicine and anesthesia

Black, Colin S. et al.

Journal of Critical Care , Volume 46 , 88 - 93

 

Link:

https://www.jccjournal.org/article/S0883-9441(18)30020-0/abstract

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » ab1630's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.paywalls oa.altmetrics oa.surveys oa.citations oa.open_science oa.stem oa.paywalled oa.medicine oa.metrics

Date tagged:

06/03/2018, 15:42

Date published:

06/03/2018, 11:43