Unbundling Open Access dimensions: a conceptual discussion to reduce terminology inconsistencies (preprint) | Submitted to 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators (STI 2018)

ab1630's bookmarks 2018-06-16


"Abstract: The current ways in which documents are made freely accessible in the Web no longer adhere to the models established Budapest/Bethesda/Berlin (BBB) definitions of Open Access (OA). Since those definitions were established, OA-related terminology has expanded, trying to keep up with all the variants of OA publishing that are out there. However, the inconsistent and arbitrary terminology that is being used to refer to these variants are complicating communication about OA-related issues. This study intends to initiate a discussion on this issue, by proposing a conceptual model of OA. Our model features six different dimensions (authoritativeness, user rights, stability, immediacy, peer-review, and cost). Each dimension allows for a range of different options. We believe that by combining the options in these six dimensions, we can arrive at all the current variants of OA, while avoiding ambiguous and/or arbitrary terminology. This model can be an useful tool for funders and policy makers who need to decide exactly which aspects of OA are necessary for each specific scenario...."

Alberto Martín-Martín*, Rodrigo Costas**, Thed N. van Leeuwen*** and Emilio Delgado López-Cózar*




From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » ab1630's bookmarks


oa.new oa.terminology oa.definitions oa.obstacles oa.growth oa.recommendations oa.costs oa.quality oa.sustainability oa.principles oa.licensing oa.peer_review oa.reuse oa.debates oa.libre oa.economics_of

Date tagged:

06/16/2018, 14:25

Date published:

06/16/2018, 10:26