Rethinking the Journal Impact Factor and Publishing in the Digital Age | The Journal of Clinical and Aesthetic Dermatology

mdelhaye's bookmarks 2020-02-16

Summary:

Clinical and experimental literature search has changed significantly over the past few decades, and with it, the way in which we value information. Today, our need for immediate access to relevant and specific literature, regardless of specialty, has led to a growing demand for open access to publications. The Journal Impact Factor (JIF) has been a long-time standard for representing the quality or “prestige” of a journal, but it appears to be losing its relevance. Here, we define the JIF and deconstruct its validity as a modern measure of a journal’s quality, discuss the current models of academic publication, including their advantages and shortcomings, and discuss the benefits and shortcomings of a variety of open-access models, including costs to the author. We have quantified a nonsubscribed physician’s access to full articles associated with dermatologic disease and aesthetics cited on PubMed. For some of the most common dermatology conditions, 23.1 percent of citations (ranging from 17.2% for melasma to 31.9% for malignant melanoma) were available as free full articles, and for aesthetic procedures, 18.9 percent of citations (ranging from 11.9% for laser hair removal to 27.9% for botulinum toxin) were available as free full articles. Finally, we discuss existing alternative metrics for measuring journal impact and propose the adoption of a superior publishing model, one that satisfies modern day standards of scholarly knowledge pursuit and dissemination of scholarly publications for dermatology and all of medical science.

Link:

https://jcadonline.com/rethinking-digital-age/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » mdelhaye's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.medicine oa.jif oa.publishing oa.citations oa.metrics oa.quality oa.impact

Date tagged:

02/16/2020, 12:00

Date published:

02/16/2020, 07:00