Are publications on zoological taxonomy under attack? | Royal Society Open Science

flavoursofopenscience's bookmarks 2021-02-10

Summary:

Pinto Ângelo Parise, Mejdalani Gabriel, Mounce Ross, Silveira Luís Fábio, Marinoni Luciane and Rafael José Albertino. 2021. Are publications on zoological taxonomy under attack? R. Soc. open sci.8: 201617. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201617


Abstract

Taxonomy is essential to biological sciences and the priority field in face of the biodiversity crisis. The industry of scientific publications has made extensive promotion and display of bibliometric indexes, resulting in side effects such as the Journal Impact Factor™ (JIF) mania. Inadequacies of the widely used indexes to assess taxonomic publications are among the impediments for the progress of this field. Based on an unusually high proportion of self-citations, the mega-journal Zootaxa, focused on zoological taxonomy, was suppressed from the Journal Citation Reports (JCR, Clarivate™). A prompt reaction from the scientific community against this decision took place exposing myths and misuses of bibliometrics. Our goal is to shed light on the impact of misuse of bibliometrics to the production in taxonomy. We explored JCR's metrics for 2010–2018 of 123 zoological journals publishing taxonomic studies. Zootaxa, with around 15 000 citations, received 311% more citations than the second most cited journal, and shows higher levels of self-citations than similar journals. We consider Zootaxa's scope and the fact that it is a mega-journal are insufficient to explain its high level of self-citation. Instead, this result is related to the ‘Zootaxa phenomenon', a sociological bias that includes visibility and potentially harmful misconceptions that portray the journal as the only one that publishes taxonomic studies. Menaces to taxonomy come from many sources and the low bibliometric indexes, including JIF, are only one factor among a range of threats. Instead of being focused on statistically illiterate journal metrics endorsing the villainy of policies imposed by profit-motivated companies, taxonomists should be engaged with renewed strength in actions directly connected to the promotion and practice of this science without regard for citation analysis.

Link:

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsos.201617

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » flavoursofopenscience's bookmarks

Tags:

oa.new oa.bibliometrics oa.taxonomy oa.practices oa.publishing oa.jif oa.metrics oa.gold oa.biology oa.citations oa.negative oa.objections oa.debates oa.journals

Date tagged:

02/10/2021, 12:29

Date published:

02/10/2021, 07:29