The tale of the open access ‘ugly duckling’ | Open Scholarship

abernard102@gmail.com 2013-02-07

Summary:

"It is often assumed that the Humanities and Social Sciences disciplines is the open access’ ugly duckling’ lagging far behind the Science, Technology and Medicine collective. Whilst this may be true in terms of the pure volume of open access articles and journals published (in part due to both support and pressure from research funders), this is certainty not true in innovation, for example the hugely successful  Open Humanities Press which publishes well-regarded open access books, and grassroots interest from academic staff. A lot of recent attention and dialogue has focussed on some of the negative attitudes shown towards open access in the Humanities and Social Sciences, whilst a lot of the positives have been under reported and ignored. I would like to take the time to dwell on some of these and show the potential HSS has to become a beautiful open access swan. Specifically, I have been intrigued by two encouraging phenomena in the social and behavioural sciences and the humanities; Firstly, the blossoming number of Library-Academic partnerships producing new journals, and secondly the rise of the cross-discipline ‘super’ journal..."

Link:

http://libraryblogs.is.ed.ac.uk/openscholarship/2013/02/06/ugly-duckling/

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.gold oa.business_models oa.publishers oa.comment oa.libraries oa.humanities oa.librarians oa.memberships oa.ojs oa.sage oa.megajournals oa.open_humanities_press oa.open_library_humanities oa.social_sciences_directory oa.humanities_directory oa.ssh oa.journals

Date tagged:

02/07/2013, 12:36

Date published:

02/07/2013, 07:36