ingentaconnect Open access metadata: current practices and proposed solutions

abernard102@gmail.com 2013-06-14

Summary:

Use the link to access pay-per-view options for the article published in the journal Learned Publishing available from the ALPSP.  "Nearly every major publisher offers open access content of some sort, but open access metadata standards are non-existent amongst content providers. Users, librarians, content providers, and technology vendors who offer OpenURL resolvers and discovery services all stand to benefit from standardized ways to indicate what content is open access and what is not. Additionally, all stakeholders would benefit from a standardized method by which one can ascertain what form of open access any content may be; indeed, there are many definitions of open access. There is ample evidence that every publisher handles their content metadata differently and this creates inefficiencies in the scholarly information supply chain and leads to user confusion. Many initiatives are currently working on solutions to these problems including the NISO KBART workgroup, NISO's Open Discovery Initiative, and NISO's very recently created Open Access Initiative. There are also pre-existing concepts based on services, such as CrossRef's CrossMark service and discovery systems that hold promise with respect to open access content and metadata."

Link:

http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/alpsp/lp/2013/00000026/00000003/art00002

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) » abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.business_models oa.publishers oa.metadata oa.standards oa.crossref oa.niso oa.alpsp oa.paywalled

Date tagged:

06/14/2013, 12:50

Date published:

06/14/2013, 08:50