Authors Guild Argues That Google Books Should Be Infringing Because Aaron Swartz | Techdirt

abernard102@gmail.com 2014-12-07

Summary:

"The saga of the Authors Guild v. Google Books continues to make its way through the courts. This has been going on for years and years, and we don't need to rehash all of the background, other than a few of the more recent situations. Last year, the case went to the 2nd Circuit appeals court, supposedly to discuss the Authors Guild's desire to make its case into a class action lawsuit. However, the appeals court judges basically ignored that issue, and said it was meaningless since it seemed pretty clear that Google Books was fair use. Thus, it sent the case back to the lower court asking it to determine if Google Books is fair use. The argument is that, if it's fair use, whether or not it's a class action is moot. The lower court dutifully declared Google Books fair use a year ago. Now the case is back before the appeals court as the Authors Guild is insisting loudly that it's not fair use. Thankfully, the judges appear to be very, very skeptical. Perhaps this isn't a surprise, since they were the ones who last year were so focused on the fair use point. It seems clear that Judge Pierre Leval -- known for his support of fair use -- wasn't very interested in the Authors Guild bringing up false arguments that because Google makes money, Google Books can't be fair use ..."

Link:

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20141204/07133929328/authors-guild-argues-that-google-books-should-be-infringing-because-aaron-swartz.shtml

From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) ยป abernard102@gmail.com

Tags:

oa.new oa.comment oa.copyright oa.licensing oa.fair_use oa.litigation oa.digitization oa.authors_guild oa.google.books oa.libre

Date tagged:

12/07/2014, 09:03

Date published:

12/07/2014, 04:03