Study of massive preprint archive hints at the geography of plagiarism | Science/AAAS | News 2014-12-12


"New analyses of the hundreds of thousands of technical manuscripts submitted to arXiv, the repository of digital preprint articles, are offering some intriguing insights into the consequences—and geography—of scientific plagiarism. It appears that copying text from other papers is more common in some nations than others, but the outcome is generally the same for authors who copy extensively: Their papers don’t get cited much. Since its founding in 1991, arXiv has become the world's largest venue for sharing findings in physics, math, and other mathematical fields. It publishes hundreds of papers daily and is fast approaching its millionth submission. Anyone can send in a paper, and submissions don’t get full peer review. However, the papers do go through a quality-control process. The final check is a computer program that compares the paper's text with the text of every other paper already published on arXiv. The goal is to flag papers that have a high likelihood of having plagiarized published work ..."


From feeds:

Open Access Tracking Project (OATP) »

Tags: oa.comment oa.arxiv oa.studies oa.plagiarism oa.repositories

Date tagged:

12/12/2014, 08:49

Date published:

12/12/2014, 03:49